Subject:
|
Re: Santa Fe Numbers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:43:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
720 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Scott Arthur writes:
> (1) I'm no fan of stickers, and I wish lego would supply a few sheets per
> set where they must use them. I'd pay the extra 5p it'd cost them to do that.
As opposed to costing another 5p (or whatever in cash), it would more likely
show up as a shortcoming of the set elsewhere. Would you be willing to
accept an instruction booklet that is abbreviated by 8 pages? How about
getting parts that are even more discolored/warped than current offerings?
Heh- I'm not disagreeing with you on the point, though. I agree that an
extra set would be great. I'd probably use stickers a lot more if I had an
extra set.
And on the other subject:
> Better than a Fabuland Service Station any day!
I can't believe that I never looked up my Lugnet member number as a set
<set:415>. Wow- I'm really boring... a 2x10 parts pack from 1966, thus
predating me by 3 years.
--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers
|
| (...) Well I got 3605, 3915 and one which I doubt I'll open for a while. Neither of my opened 10020 numbers refers to a set or even a part... YET! But, using google, I did find a real train numbered 3605: (URL) than a Fabuland Service Station any (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
