Subject:
|
Re: Santa Fe Numbers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:16:19 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
keilers@qwest./antispam/net
|
Viewed:
|
548 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Rob -
Great idea on the numbering. This sounds like it would fit well with the
trains. I think that all things like this should be named (or numbered in this
case). My favorite set, Croc is something I never came upon. And if you don't
mind I am going to number my Super Chief with the same number. Fantastic idea.
Kurt
Rob Hendrix wrote:
> Weoird, but cool. My 354 was a set from 1972, the year I was born. Not
> really excited about the content, but at least its "town". My other number
> (94) was from a set which didnt have much info attached to it. But the
> picture was cool.
>
> -Rob
>
> "Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:Gs0o3n.A3p@lugnet.com...
> > After I received my Santa Fe sets yesterday I was thinking about the
> > numbers. Sure it would be nice to have a really low number (like less than
> > 10) but it would also be pretty neat to have a number that corresponds to a
> > classic or favorite LEGO set. Imagine if your Santa Fe was number A4558 or
> > A375 or A6075 or A928. Personally, I'd love to have A4551 (Crocodile
> > Engine) or A6542 (Launch 'N Load Sea Port).
> >
> > Sadly, of the three I received (A1522, A1527, and A1636) only one of them is
> > actually a LEGO set number and it (1636) was a 3+ Basic Bucket of Bricks
> > (http://guide.lugnet.com/set/1636) - not very glamorous!
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mike Walsh - mike_walsh at mindspring dot com
> > http://www.nclug.net - North Carolina LEGO Users Group
> > http://www.carolinatrainbuilders - Carolina Train Builders
> > http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?u=mpw - Brick Depot
> >
> >
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers
|
| Weoird, but cool. My 354 was a set from 1972, the year I was born. Not really excited about the content, but at least its "town". My other number (94) was from a set which didnt have much info attached to it. But the picture was cool. -Rob "Mike (...) (22 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
15 Messages in This Thread: ![Santa Fe Numbers -Mike Walsh (24-Feb-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Rob Hendrix (24-Feb-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Lawrence Wilkes (24-Feb-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Jason J. Railton (25-Feb-02 to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Scott Arthur (27-Feb-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Bert Giesen (27-Feb-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Scott Arthur (27-Feb-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Tony Hafner (27-Feb-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -David Schilling (4-Mar-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Bob Parker (5-Mar-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -William R. Ward (5-Mar-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Blake Kunisch (5-Mar-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Robert Powell (5-Mar-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Santa Fe Numbers -Aaron Gershon (11-Mar-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|