Subject:
|
Re: 10020 Registry opinion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 04:39:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
585 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, James Trobaugh writes:
>
> I'm working on an option to allow people that don't know their number to
> just check an box and not enter anything into the number field. Then they
> would show at the bottom of the list (the one that is sorted by number of
> course).
Sounds good.
> As for allowing status of train [built, unopened, parted] would be a bit
> tricker since I'd have to set up a way for people to edit their information
> on the list, that would reguire some type of security system so that the
> proper people are updating their data and not someone else's. The honor
> system would be great, but we all know that it's doesn't work well here on
> the NET.
Maybe just a comment field... one could comment on the intended "fate" of
the set when one registers it. If for some reason one felt the need to
change it, an email to you?? Hopefully not that high volume of changes.
This registry thing is a neat, commmunity building idea. Is it neat enough
to link to from the .trains front page? email me your opinions (rather than
post them, keep the clutter down).
(the volume of discussion on the 10020 set has been quite high. I'm hoping
the "I got mine" will die down a bit soon, but the volume is a clear
testament that LEGO(r) has a winner here, at least among adult train heads
:-) Pretty cool, huh?)
++Lar
>
> In lugnet.trains, Dean Husby writes:
> >
> > "Rob Hendrix" <rmhendrix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Gs2DoJ.27n@lugnet.com...
> > > I'm not complaining because I'm not on top, but I was thinking that:
> > >
> > > A???? (unopened) Craig Squier 2/23/2002 North Carolina United
> > > States
> > >
> > > should be on the bottom. Sure he could have #5 for all we know, but we
> > > don't. He could have #10000. He has his rightful place on the registry
> > > (though, personally, I would like to see the number instead of ????). But
> > > that is his choice. What do you guys and gals think?
> >
> >
> > I agee fully. He should be at the bottom.
> >
> > I'd also like to see the status. Where the set is together or in box or
> > permently parted out...
> >
> > Dean
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Is the word out? (Was Re: 10020 Registry opinion)
|
| I agree with the rest of the people that have posted that the registry is a good idea but I wonder how many sets are NOT going to get 'registered' because a) people don't know about it (parent's who buy it for the kids, non-lego train collectors, (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10020 Registry opinion
|
| I'm working on an option to allow people that don't know their number to just check an box and not enter anything into the number field. Then they would show at the bottom of the list (the one that is sorted by number of course). As for allowing (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
