Subject:
|
Re: 10020 Registry opinion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 01:15:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
360 times
|
| |
|
|
"Rob Hendrix" <rmhendrix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Gs2DoJ.27n@lugnet.com...
> I'm not complaining because I'm not on top, but I was thinking that:
>
> A???? (unopened) Craig Squier 2/23/2002 North Carolina United
> States
>
> should be on the bottom. Sure he could have #5 for all we know, but we
> don't. He could have #10000. He has his rightful place on the registry
> (though, personally, I would like to see the number instead of ????). But
> that is his choice. What do you guys and gals think?
I agee fully. He should be at the bottom.
I'd also like to see the status. Where the set is together or in box or
permently parted out...
Dean
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 10020 Registry opinion
|
| I'm working on an option to allow people that don't know their number to just check an box and not enter anything into the number field. Then they would show at the bottom of the list (the one that is sorted by number of course). As for allowing (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | 10020 Registry opinion
|
| I'm not complaining because I'm not on top, but I was thinking that: A???? (unopened) Craig Squier 2/23/2002 North Carolina United States should be on the bottom. Sure he could have #5 for all we know, but we don't. He could have #10000. He has his (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
