To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 15326
15325  |  15327
Subject: 
Re: 10020 Registry opinion
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 01:49:30 GMT
Viewed: 
472 times
  
I'm working on an option to allow people that don't know their number to
just check an box and not enter anything into the number field. Then they
would show at the bottom of the list (the one that is sorted by number of
course).

As for allowing status of train [built, unopened, parted] would be a bit
tricker since I'd have to set up a way for people to edit their information
on the list, that would reguire some type of security system so that the
proper people are updating their data and not someone else's. The honor
system would be great, but we all know that it's doesn't work well here on
the NET.

jt

In lugnet.trains, Dean Husby writes:

"Rob Hendrix" <rmhendrix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Gs2DoJ.27n@lugnet.com...
I'm not complaining because I'm not on top, but I was thinking that:

A???? (unopened)    Craig Squier    2/23/2002    North Carolina    United
States

should be on the bottom.  Sure he could have #5 for all we know, but we
don't.  He could have #10000.  He has his rightful place on the registry
(though, personally, I would like to see the number instead of ????).  But
that is his choice.  What do you guys and gals think?


I agee fully. He should be at the bottom.

I'd also like to see the status. Where the set is together or in box or
permently parted out...

Dean



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 10020 Registry opinion
 
(...) Sounds good. (...) Maybe just a comment field... one could comment on the intended "fate" of the set when one registers it. If for some reason one felt the need to change it, an email to you?? Hopefully not that high volume of changes. This (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 10020 Registry opinion
 
"Rob Hendrix" <rmhendrix@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Gs2DoJ.27n@lugnet.com... (...) I agee fully. He should be at the bottom. I'd also like to see the status. Where the set is together or in box or permently parted out... Dean (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)

8 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR