Subject:
|
Re: Track? MOC or New?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 04:13:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
454 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> You raise good points. I forgot that Flex Track has two important
> characteristics:
>
> - you can cut it to the length you desire
Of course most track can be cut to any length.
> - you can bend it to the shape you desire (within limits)
This really is the most important feature of flex track, there's also a
third feature, at least for the smaller scales
- it comes in longer lengths which allow fewer track joins and thus
higher reliability
> My suggested track design addresses only the second point, not the first.
> And as Ross points out it is liable to be an adult only item, it would never
> withstand toybox storage. Hence limited utility and not likely to have the
> numbers to get produced
An expanding track section would have some capability to adjust length
(in fact, I think some of the new one piece track/roadbed systems have
expandable straight tracks, this would be useful for laying track at
angles other than 90 degrees so could add some valuable flexibility with
a not horribly complex track element.
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Track? MOC or New?
|
| (...) You raise good points. I forgot that Flex Track has two important characteristics: - you can cut it to the length you desire - you can bend it to the shape you desire (within limits) My suggested track design addresses only the second point, (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
