Subject:
|
Re: Track? MOC or New?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 03:36:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
386 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Frank Filz writes:
> Tony Priestman wrote:
> >
> > I have some ideas about flexible track which I intend to develop, but I
> > think the current track geometry is too limited to be worth expanding.
>
> I'm not sure LEGO flex track would work very well. Flex track needs to
> be cut to fit.
Not necessarily. That's the conventional way to do it, yes... but what if
there were sliding parts at each tie point? in that case the outer rail
would "get longer" so to speak, with no cutting needed. Might be frightfully
expensive though.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Track? MOC or New?
|
| (...) I'd like to comment a little on this, I've thought about the logistics... First, model trains have flex track, one rail is usually permenant, while the other slides. Also, they have pure metal rails, now with LEGO track, there is plastic under (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
