To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 14284
14283  |  14285
Subject: 
Track? MOC or New?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 17 Dec 2001 20:45:21 GMT
Viewed: 
335 times
  
I am waiting for ten years now to get automated points, stops and
decouplers, as well as new track parts.

I am wondering what the train community would like to see as new track parts
or automation.

I have some examples on brickshelf:

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=9156

Did anyone try to make their own track of existing pieces. I am pondering
if I am going to start....

Guido



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Track? MOC or New?
 
I have some ideas about flexible track which I intend to develop, but I think the current track geometry is too limited to be worth expanding. I *would* like to see new track parts, and a larger radius curve & new points would be top of my list. On (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Track? MOC or New?
 
I've toyed with the idea of modifying the points (switches): By removing a section of the turnout, two points can be placed turnout-to-turnout while keeping standard track centres and maintaining an overall length of 3 straights ;-) ...have a play (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Track? MOC or New?
 
(...) What would I like to see track wise? - Automated turnouts as you mention - A new larger curve radius, probably 16 studs larger - 4 stud and 8 stud track sections - New geometry turnouts + one which the divergent track is equivalent to one (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.trains)

19 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR