 | | Re: New Pics 4-8-8-4 Big Boy
|
|
Big...Boy...Steamer... What a beast of a locomotive. Very impressive model, Stacy. The detail, mechanics, and overall visual appeal of your model are great. Wish LEGO had a larger radius of curve track. As we are all constrained to the tight radius, (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
(...) ho HO! -- not just the brick then. Swingin'!!! (I shouldda scrolled down farther on the big image before asking! :-) --Todd (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
(...) BTW, I should mention that we have decided that we are only going to run cars with actual LUGs and LTCs on them. (The size of the list should explain why) If you are a part of one of these groups, please contact us if you haven't already: (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New Pics 4-8-8-4 Big Boy
|
|
(...) Auxiliary tender (with two 9v motors) & a Union Pacific Crane & Boom tender. The auxiliary tender will provide me with a little more umph...to pull more cars and push the big locomotive. Stacy (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
(...) Haven't checked it, but I'm going on the principle that clone brands have printed items on their studs, and that we aren't saying 'LEGO' anywhere. I honestly do not believe this will be a problem. Just to be sure, I left Brad Justus a voice (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
(...) No LEGO attire-- just GMLTC shirts and Brickenrocker shirts (for me at least;-) (...) lol I *am* poor, I have printed (and embroidered), and I do have enough to do;-) (...) Oh yeah. -John (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: The Construction Site Boxcar...
|
|
(...) All followups to lugnet.publish Well I just cleared both my Netscape and IE cache and I still see the full size pics when I click on the thumbnails on this page... (URL) the first picture it brings me to... (URL) picture brings me to... (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.loc.us.ma.bos, lugnet.trains, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: The Construction Site Boxcar...
|
|
(...) Na. Just flush your cache and try again. I bet you have cached versions somewhere or relative pathing problems. ++Lar (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.loc.us.ma.bos, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
We already have GMLTC shirts, through the work of John Neal. He is also working on ID cards for us all to wear, and banners with our logo and url to hang on or above the layout. John is our designated 'public relations' person! I'm really looking (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
(...) Ooo. Have you checked the LDRAW-on-studs bit with TLC? Steve (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
(...) and "how (...) we (...) LLC (...) I hope they don't. But somehow, I don't think they will, at least to those who are really looking and not just strolling by. This might seem a bit a funky to ask, but is anyone behind the GMLTC layout going to (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
(...) The ldraw.org site header logo *is* the text of the sign. It will be a HUGE rendering of the 2x3 brick on the site, with LDRAW detailed on the studs, and the words 'ldraw.org, Centralized LDraw Resources' in the same visual arrangement as the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
(...) We at the GMLTC will be very sensitive about that issue. When we display the layout at train shows, we are very emphatic when asked (one of the most asked questions, BTW, right behind "how many bricks are there in the layout" and "how long (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: The Construction Site Boxcar...
|
|
(...) Hmmm... Thats Odd I just went back and checked with both IE and Netscape and I both pictures clicked through fine. I will look at my code though to see if there is something obscure in there. (...) Thanks! Eric Kingsley The New England LEGO (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.loc.us.ma.bos, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
(...) Hey, that's kind of interesting from a community-strategic point of view... What you've got there with the signage is an opportunity to let people know -- or at least hint at -- the fact that LDraw is a fan-created and fan-run project/system (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
|
(...) Ya, well said! What I hope we as a community can help LEGO avoid is (to coin a phrase) "fansploitation" -- i.e., taking advantage of or exploiting things that fans did which they wish they'd thought of or done first, since they're getting into (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks Larry, Horst, Ezio
|
|
(...) Indeed, but it was modified to include more people than just me (showing that I could build something from whatever I was given). ++Lar (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.it, lugnet.loc.de, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Construction Site Boxcar...
|
|
(...) permission (...) any thumbnail. Thumbnails look good, though. ++Lar (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.loc.us.ma.bos, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: what is the min production run #?
|
|
(...) <snip> Don't tell us! Tell Jason. Let LD look in ONE place for this info NOT in many posts scattered all over the group. ++Lar (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks Larry, Horst, Ezio
|
|
(...) Thanks for sharing your report with us. Your game seems to be a more developed version of the one we made at Torsten Werneckes home some weeks ago: using extreme none-train-theme-parts to create a totally new effekt. (As done with the technic (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.it, lugnet.loc.de, lugnet.trains)
|
