 | | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
"Xanthra47" <jmantor@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:HLAEDI.1sGr@lugnet.com... (...) Ok I'm stumped. I don't know what to do about this. I think we need some input from some serious train guys on this one, personally. I see postives and (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
Here's a better example of how we could integrate train tracks into a moonbase by running it through the space previously reserved for "roads." This is a super module with train track encircling it : (URL) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
Why not run the train tracks in the space that is already reserved for transport systems ? I assumed that was the original plan all along : ) It still works if you stick in more straight pieces. Check out this pic to see what I mean : (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
(...) Looks good so far... I believe the positioning is good as well as the train height. I have already started a module with a train. I also agree that a train is not best for intra-moonbase travel but might be used for cargo, industry, utility (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
"Mike Petrucelli" <lordi@erols.com> wrote in message news:HLA8B2.zM1@lugnet.com... (...) or (...) image (...) considering (...) might (...) Thanks Mike, but I found the part down thread! (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
"Orion Pobursky" <orion@dontaddthis.p...ursky.com> wrote in message news:HLA8pr.11rn@lugnet.com... (...) or (...) That's it! You rule. [ j o n ] (URL) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
(...) Try this: (URL) this what you were looking for? -Orion (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
(...) Well I don't use LDraw myself but I did take this. (URL) not much, but if you want to use it as filler till you get a better image feel free to. (...) Cool. -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
|
(URL) what I have so far. I can't find a curved track part for LDraw or I'd put up an image of that too. I'd love to get some input on this from some of you Train folk considering that this should appeal to a lot of you. Hafner will be helping out (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Assistance
|
|
Pedro, I have experimented with many different mechanisms for auto-discharging hoppers, although none have been like the one you describe. I have tried ones with levers that are moved up and down as the wagon passes a trackside mechanism, and while (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Pictures and report from the EUROBUSS tour.
|
|
I got some pictures from TLC, which I have uploaded. They are the last ones (URL) Jensen <sonnich@hot.ee> wrote in message news:HKApyM.ssx@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) I (...) next (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Pictures of 8mm:1ft scale trains
|
|
(...) The Mk3 coaches were a bit thrown together as I needed a passenger train quickly. They date from before my first exhibition alongside other scales and gauges in October 2000. The bogies have been rebuilt several times as the trim kept falling (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.trains.dcc?
|
|
Mark Riley wrote: > perhaps it > is time for a DCC .trains subgroup? I'm wondering if eyeballs glaze over when > DCC programming is discussed or some cringe at the wanton mutilation of pristine > Lego parts? I worry about the glazing effect, too. I (...) (21 years ago, 14-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | TCS M1 decoder = good
|
|
Hi all, Well, I just thought I'd share my experience using a TCS M1 decoder. This is a neat little decoder designed for N / HO scale, and fits nicely into LEGO train motors - read about it here (URL) (21 years ago, 14-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.trains.dcc?
|
|
(...) Well, yes, there are the motors: (2 URLs) But, why then stop there? Slice that wire: (URL) Drill those plates: (2 URLs) Saw some track: (URL) Solder a switch: (URL) Drill'em, burn'em: (URL) Mwaaahahahaha... Whoa... Ahem... It's a slippery (...) (21 years ago, 13-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.trains.dcc?
|
|
(...) I guess I really really don't see the need for a moc group... what would be left after you take the mocs away? I don't think any other theme has separated out mocs, has it? After all isn't just about everything we do a moc? Help me understand (...) (21 years ago, 13-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.trains.dcc?
|
|
(...) Oh, it still is. But allowances must be made, after all... a DCCized motor is a good thing that outweighs any impurity. Or does it? Gee... maybe you HAVE rubbed off on me. (21 years ago, 13-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.trains.dcc?
|
|
well if it goes, on the same note, lugnet.trains.moc? Sort out the trains group so you can follow one subject matter? I like the thought of DCC, I'm gonna start fooling around with it after I do a test Run, & maybe a learners run on an HO model... (...) (21 years ago, 13-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.trains.dcc?
|
|
<snip> (...) required (...) </snip> I must be rubbing off on you Lar. Before now, ANY mutilation of parts was considered sacrilegious blasphemy by you! :P Rob "Have Lego, Will Dremel" Hendrix (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.trains.dcc?
|
|
(...) It may make sense from a compartmentalization standpoint but has the volume been that great? I admit of bias since it's a topic of interest, but I'm not thinking it's high enough that we NEED to do this. As for mutilation of parts... ??? There (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
