Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.trains.dcc?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:45:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1283 times
|
| |
|
|
<snip>
> As for mutilation of parts... ??? There is not a lot of mutilation • required
> (Except for the motors themselves of course)
</snip>
I must be rubbing off on you Lar. Before now, ANY mutilation of parts was
considered sacrilegious blasphemy by you! :P
Rob "Have Lego, Will Dremel" Hendrix
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: lugnet.trains.dcc?
|
| (...) Oh, it still is. But allowances must be made, after all... a DCCized motor is a good thing that outweighs any impurity. Or does it? Gee... maybe you HAVE rubbed off on me. (21 years ago, 13-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.trains.dcc?
|
| (...) It may make sense from a compartmentalization standpoint but has the volume been that great? I admit of bias since it's a topic of interest, but I'm not thinking it's high enough that we NEED to do this. As for mutilation of parts... ??? There (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
