 | | Re: TeenLTC?
|
|
(...) Tim Cortney (if it spelt right, btw, tim, is you read this, when is the Lego maniac's webring going to work?)? Josh (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Stop the madness...
|
|
... and go build trains!!!!! 1) I will invite privately each train club and LTC arm of LUGs, no one will be left out! 2) *We* will then privately decide on a name which really can be as arbitrary as QWERTY, who cares! (and not have a 'Life of Brain' (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: TeenLTC?
|
|
If we are to do this i would like to have a "Teen-Brick-Fest"? I think there aren't very many teens and there would only be two or three teens per LTC (my opinion). and Mentors meaning bosses because thats the exact opposite of what we are trying to (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: It's a P42 (Was: Nice model of a AMD103)
|
|
(...) BTW, its also called a P40, but the P42 is slightly different. The AMD103 is the most common name I have heard for it. Josh (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
|
(...) In a nutshell, because while we do trains, it's not *all* we do. (It's just all we've done lately...) And we don't (disclaimer: I'm making an assumption here - I haven't checked with NALUG lately, these are things we bantered around last (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | TeenLTC?
|
|
Well, here are the proposals: -Ages 10 & up (maybe younger) -possibly some older folks for "mentors" -more... I think this would work great, just like model railroading's teen club, as it would alow teens to show what they can create, and also a (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
|
(...) Well, let's talk about this, because there are some gray areas here. If a club/group are committed to showing at train shows, then why the reticence using the LTC name form? I don't think it's silly to use both, because perhaps there are or (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
|
(...) This is especially true if you want the 'I' to stand for 'International'. Martin (In Australia) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
|
(...) Just using those as an example because I thought that they are the most common nationwide. Participating in *any* public train show is fine by me:-) -John (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Building a gravel silo
|
|
I'm not quite sure I follow your ASCII art. Can you post a picture some place (either a picture of what you got or a drawing in paint)? Frank Buiting <frank.buiting@infopulse.nl> wrote in message news:G9F0Kw.5Ms@lugnet.com... (...) with (...) into (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
|
If you are going to form IOLTC please--PLEASE have no age restrictions as the TEEN LEGO TRAIN CLUB may be forming and would like to have deligates in the IOLTC. thanks kai (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
|
"James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in message news:G9FsvA.47n@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] . (...) to (...) NCLUG is a similar situation - NCLUG/NCLTC would essentially be one in the same. That may not always be the case (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a name? (I*LTC)
|
|
"James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in message news:G9FtHA.68o@lugnet.com... (...) anyway. (...) IOLTC it is, as soon as I get the confirmation back from Pairlist it will go live. I had come to the same conclusion this morning but am (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | What's in a name? (I*LTC)
|
|
Ok, we've had proposals for Brotherhood, Organization, Congress and Association to replace the star. Several people have expessed a mild preference for Organization. If no one has any strenuous objections, I suggest that IOLTC it is. Unless I hear (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
|
(...) Same for NELUG. (...) I agree with James and I would add "why GATS and NMRA"? Here in the New England they don't even come around for us to display. Our main option is Greenberg which is mostly up and down the East Coast. Plus others do (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
|
John Neal wrote in message <3A9C257F.C626578B@u...st.net>... (...) Just a bit of a nit, John... VLC isn't centered on trains, but our only public display (so far) has been a train layout and we plan to exhibit at train shows again, 2-3 times this (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: I*LTC charter
|
|
International Association of Lego Train Clubs? if you are going to have induvidual clubs join. (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
|
(...) I don't think that the LUG vs LTC thing is really relevant. As a prime example, NALUG has done 2 trains shows, intends to do more in the future, but has no intention or desire to form a seperate LTC - we're stunningly informal as it is, and it (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: I*LTC charter
|
|
A number of us must have all independently decided that a little facilitation/summarization would be a good idea. I think this is an excellent statement of purpose. In lugnet.trains.org, James Brown writes: <snip> (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: I<whatever>LTC summary
|
|
(...) Right. And to make it work, it's not required that every group conform to some rigid standard (ala N-trak), although that gives you the most flexibility. *all* that is required is that a few modules from each layout can somehow interface, not (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
