Subject:
|
Re: I*LTC charter
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:16:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
308 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
A number of us must have all independently decided that a little
facilitation/summarization would be a good idea. I think this is an
excellent statement of purpose.
In lugnet.trains.org, James Brown writes:
<snip>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | I*LTC charter
|
| A lot of the bouncing around has been of what I*LTC would be/do/want/need/whatever. Here's a proposal, in an attempt to move things forward a bit more quickly. Obviously, this should/will need tweaking; it's based on what I've seen bandied about, (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
3 Messages in This Thread: ![I*LTC charter -James Brown (27-Feb-01 to lugnet.trains.org)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: I*LTC charter -Kai Brodersen (27-Feb-01 to lugnet.trains.org)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|