Subject:
|
Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:23:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
395 times
|
| |
|
|
"James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in message
news:G9FsvA.47n@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.trains.org, John Neal writes:
[ ... snipped ... ]
.
>
> I don't think that the LUG vs LTC thing is really relevant. As a prime
> example, NALUG has done 2 trains shows, intends to do more in the future,
> but has no intention or desire to form a seperate LTC - we're stunningly
> informal as it is, and it would feel pretty silly to most of us, I think, • to
> have 2 different names for the same bunch of people.
>
> Even though our "focus" isn't necessarily trains, we do train shows, and
> IMHO, that's enough.
>
> James
NCLUG is a similar situation - NCLUG/NCLTC would essentially be one in the
same. That may not always be the case but for now, it is.
Mike
--
Mike Walsh - mike_walsh at mindspring dot com
http://www.nclug.net - North Carolina LEGO Users Group
http://www.nclug.net/ctb - Carolina Train Builders
http://www.brickbay.com/store.asp?u=mpw - Brick Depot
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
| If you are going to form IOLTC please--PLEASE have no age restrictions as the TEEN LEGO TRAIN CLUB may be forming and would like to have deligates in the IOLTC. thanks kai (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The formation of an ILTCO
|
| (...) I don't think that the LUG vs LTC thing is really relevant. As a prime example, NALUG has done 2 trains shows, intends to do more in the future, but has no intention or desire to form a seperate LTC - we're stunningly informal as it is, and it (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
