| |
hi
when talking about cylinders or pistons
maybe 2 way piston would be nice
to previously discussed (yes tobbe i should use this word :)) T shape
"angle" connector
i would add cross shaped
definitely dividing by 3 is not too simple by nature of axles which divide
by 4
it can be done but almost everytime it takes much space or weight
pixel
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message
news:HAHx1p.Kx7@lugnet.com...
> > Reintroduction of single acting (old style) pneumatic cylinders.
>
> Why on earth do you want those?
>
> The only thing I like better is the fact they only use one tube per • cylinder,
> but most times it's not a problem.
>
> I'd much rather have longer cylinders in the new style.
>
> Best regards,
> /Tobbe
> http://www.lotek.nu
> (remove SPAM when e-mailing)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: what else could be done
|
| (...) Why on earth do you want those? The only thing I like better is the fact they only use one tube per cylinder, but most times it's not a problem. I'd much rather have longer cylinders in the new style. Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
