 | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Allan Bedford
|
| | | (...) I wasn't really suggesting it for the LEGENDS series, but rather presenting it as an example of a small scale, small piece count Technic set that could retail for less than $120. Way way less than $120. (...) Of course it's blocky.... it's (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) Personally, I dont think going back that far is a good idea. My picks for examples of great small technic sets: (being a technic fan, all of these would be sets I would consider buying either for the set or for parts) 8808 F1 Racer 8810 Cafe (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) For a small go cart, you don't even need to go that far back! The 1998 set 8219 has it all. It even seats a technic figure. I think the low seat on the 8219 looks more realistic. I like the angled engine block on 8815, though. We've also had (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) Indeed for another shining example (of this principle, not of another go-kart) you need go back no further than 1999. Now for those who have read some of my previous postings and know that I usually suggest 1970's sets as good examples, this (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Are you perhaps talking about sets like (URL) I bought a dozen of those at AU1.95 each (my first bulk set purchase!)! ROSCO (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Hmm. The 1259. My local TRU still has it for ~UKP5.00 (~US$7-$8). For me "Micro Technic" brings to mind the 8203 + 8004 which are about the same size as the 1259 (originally a promo set IRC). That said, what Brickset calls “microtechnic” (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | | (...) That sounds kinda expensive for such a small set. I think it retails for less here. (...) I think the six sets 8203, 8204, 8208, 8209, 8217 and 8218 were released simultaneously in a UK/Australia/New Zealand only launch. Apparently, they also (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I agree. But then, TRU in the UK is seldom cheap (the same shop still has ZNAP at full RRP). They gave the set away free with a larger set last year; I think the ones they are selling now is what was left over from that deal. Scott A (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) single shock absorber, which is kinda realistic. Most of today's road racing bikes have a single rear shock absorber, according to my experience. I also like the fact that is _does_ include one of the strangest technic bricks: The motorcycle (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Miguel Agullo
|
| | | | | (...) I hardly knew those. Very neat! The whole range from 8202 to 8219 is worth looking at. 8216 is another beauty. (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Steven Lane
|
| | | | (...) I hate this part I have dozens, probably from the ebay lots I buy where people cant wait to get rid of them, but each to their own. My nomination for potw (once the current list is exhausted) would be the technic triangle which has come to the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) I didn't say I liked the part personally, I just said that I liked the fact that the motorcycle sets included them. I believe that the part makes it easier for kids to build their own motorcycles. (...) My problem with the triangle is the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off? —Steven Lane
|
| | | | (...) If you removed the 'excess' you would lose a lot of the strength of the part. Although I always thought if you removed the sticky out bit you could make an excellent heavy haulage tractor hitch. Steve (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
