Subject:
|
Re: I got a defective part!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Dec 1999 12:28:50 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Selçuk <teyyareci> <sgore@superonline.*spamless*com>
|
Viewed:
|
1353 times
|
| |
| |
Tony Priestman <Tony@you-rang.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:iMt3oFA2Gea4Ewt2@you-rang.demon.co.uk...
> On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Selçuk <teyyareci> (<FnHwD9.Jt8@lugnet.com>) wrote
> at 09:15:30
>
> > Yes, this is weird but not so much as in the case that I faced with in RTL
> > in 1998. Some guy from Australia (note the distance) stated in a message to
> > RTL that while he was building his barcode truck, he noticed that, when he
> > attach a 1x2 45 degree inverse slope on top a 1x1 brick since it was
> > required in a step, the inverse slope popped out repeatedly. Although they
> > are symmetrical, i.e.. there is another couple of the same parts, only one
> > of them had this problem. Strange part of that, I faced with the same
> > problem, with the exact same pieces, at the exact same step, but in Turkey!
> >
> Consistency is more important than quality?
> --
> Tony Priestman
Actually, my reply to the above mentioned message of RTL was starting with,
IIRC, "Wow!..What a repeatability!.."
Selçuk
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I got a defective part!
|
| On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Selçuk <teyyareci> (<FnHwD9.Jt8@lugnet.com>) wrote at 09:15:30 (...) Consistency is more important than quality? (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.technic)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|