Subject:
|
Re: Technic Parallel-Motor Assembly Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Jun 2001 09:42:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1476 times
|
| |
|
|
> > Perhaps one motor at each end of an axel. That would make three or
> > four pairs with less gears.
> >
> > Something like this:
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=50534
> > [extremle quick and dirty pic to show what I mean]
>
> That's a nice idea; so basically you should connect the motors first and
> then speed the geardtrain down? I decided to speed each one down
> independently but this system seems like it would produce less friction and
> would also require fewer gears.
I have not tried my theory in practise but less gears and lower
friction is always a prio. Try to keep things as simple as possible :)
> > Be sure to connect all the wires correctly so that they actually work
> > with each other and not against ,)
>
> Hehe I had this problem several times in my tests. (for a second I was
> wondering why one motor could perform quite well while two motors would not
> move at all ;-) )
LOL!
Good luck with your project, hope you wont get sidetracked :)
/Tobbe
http://www.arnesson.nu/lotek/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Technic Parallel-Motor Assembly Question
|
| Thanks for the replies! I think I now have some ideas of how this can done... (...) I thought that it might be something with the way the gears are arranged but could not really find a way around it...adding in some sort of lubricant seems like a (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
