Subject:
|
Re: springless pneumatic pump
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sun, 29 Apr 2001 02:45:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1956 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Tom Heverly writes:
> unscrew the spring? I had thouhgt of that, but decided that everyone
> probably pops the end cap off the piston then goes from there.
>
> Unscrewing the spring is probably better for the pump, not so good for
> the spring, but maybe I should re-consider what I'm trying to do.
> remove the spring without destroying the pump. The spring's well
> being is of minor consequence to me, but I don't want it to be too bad
> off.
>
> (gingerly un screwing spring)
>
> there, unscrewed spring, not too bad off, and I'm sure it will go
> back on without too much of a fuss.
>
>
>
> Thanks alot, ...let the electro-mechanical pumpin'
> begin!
>
>
> Tom Heverly
Congrats on getting it off successfully...it took me some work to get one
off and I ended up bending the spring slightly. However in my testing it
seemed that the large pump, even without the spring, performed a bit worse
than the smaller pump (heh...I had to do a science fair project and actually
did it on this stuff). It seems that the large one just takes too much force
to push and given a bit of time, the small one can compress more air.
-Gaurav Thakur, raving madman
Can be reached at cp5670@supermail.com
http://cp5670.50megs.com/TC/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: springless pneumatic pump
|
| unscrew the spring? I had thouhgt of that, but decided that everyone probably pops the end cap off the piston then goes from there. Unscrewing the spring is probably better for the pump, not so good for the spring, but maybe I should re-consider (...) (23 years ago, 28-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
