Subject:
|
Re: I am appalled...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Dec 2000 14:15:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1712 times
|
| |
|
|
Thats right
Michael
- - -
Please reply on
medwards@ukonline.co.uk
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Home of the UK Lego Technic Club Magazine
www.technic-uk.co.uk
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Eelco Kooiker" <eelco@kooiker.demon.nl> wrote in message
news:G60w8y.IEE@lugnet.com...
> Under number 6 I see a other new piece?
>
> A liftarm 1x4 without the half bushing. Is this right?
>
> Regards,
>
> Eelco Kooiker
>
> In lugnet.technic, Amnon Silverstein writes:
> > Yay! It looks like Lego is listening, and they dejuniorized the ball • joint
> > by making it a ball with an axle hole. This converts it into a great part
> > with many possible uses. THANKS LEGO!
> > http://web.ukonline.co.uk/medwards/2001/ballnew.jpg
> > -Amnon
> >
> > In lugnet.technic, Amnon Silverstein writes:
> > > Roboriders could be saved for us big kids (I just turned 16, twenty • years
> > > ago) with a few minor changes.
> > >
> > > 1. Split the ball joint cross axle off of the leg assembly. I can do • this
> > > myself, but I hate to take a razor saw to Lego parts. The detatched
> > > ball/axle is a great part.
> > >
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: I am appalled...
|
| (...) It also comes in one of the 4 small "promo" roboriders sets that are available where I live right now. (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I am appalled...
|
| Under number 6 I see a other new piece? A liftarm 1x4 without the half bushing. Is this right? Regards, Eelco Kooiker (...) (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
