 | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) But it's not that simple. LEGO's marketing and development as of late isn't simply a new avenue of exploration, but rather an abandonment of their ideals. It would be like if Caddilac started manufacturing riding lawn mowers, cut back (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) For $99, you can buy an 8x4 foot roller coaster or a 5 foot tall Rube Goldbergian ball machine. (I have both, and they're both quite cool) K'Nex definitely has it's pros, especially for large constructions. And the parts are even more of a (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Check out (URL). This is an Australian company that has built a sizeable market in providing science workshops to school children using, among other things, K'NEX Sure, they might have tried LEGO, but they way kids in classrooms treat any (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) I always thought ZNAP was Lego's answear to K'nex (spit!), which is probably why it failed, nobody want's either. Of course K'nex is a huge failure, shame the people who make it (and the people who buy it) haven't realised that yet! :-). Steve (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) I think ZNAP was an exciting departure for Lego. I am only sorry to see it effectively withdrawn before it had a chance. And I hope, like Ralph appears to, that it may not have been the end. If you compare todays ZNAP parts with original Lego (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
<snip>....Znap was another radical new direction, and those failed. ZNAP was LEGO? I thought that it was just a way to disguise the gear motor, battery box, and flex-shafts in a discount aisle.... Seriously though, I think that ZNAP was not quite (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) MOC. (...) Yeah, actually it does. The techbots are more like Lego-spinoffs than actual Lego sets. Not-Lego sets that happen to be made by Lego corp. I don't think Lego themselves minds that though. They wanted to see if they could be (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New silver Hau ! and Tohunga . . .
|
|
I have spoken to Lego UK about 8546 - its confrimed to be released in the UK on May 1st 2001 So i will have to wait 5 days for mine :-) Michael (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: New silver Hau ! and Tohunga . . .
|
|
(...) I don't know if one would call that music. Kids probably will, thye'll like it. But it's really a strange mix of electronical sounds and such, not even with a real ongoing melody. I like to listen it once in a while, but too much can easily (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Did anyone catch that url in that 'pureist' thread?
|
|
I glanced over those messages in that thread after a while, and noticed this url: (URL) quoted an interesting passage from the article, so I went there. What a fantastic article! If anyone didn't catch it in that thread, or maybe never saw it (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
