 | | Re: new forklift, old steering
|
|
movie uploaded: (URL) (21 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new forklift, old steering
|
|
(...) thanks :-) (...) mmhh...movies can be done quite quickly, but ldraw might require some time - expecially for the chain links! My ldraw "expert" (Willy Tschager) it's away for some period, so I just can put up the basic structure, without (...) (21 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Son of Walker
|
|
hmmm... your walker brings the associacion to diver :))) cause of feets :) i've got some kind of draft of the mechanism which could walk as chicken (with back knees) but the left-right tilting mechanism isn't done and the biggest disadvantage is the (...) (21 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new forklift, old steering
|
|
superb! i especialy like the section mechanism waiting for .ldr file and movies btw: nothing can stop the expanding of the liftarm world pixel (21 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | new forklift, old steering
|
|
Hi to all! Some time ago, I published a link to a forklift-like steering, which can steer up to about 90 degrees. Here is what I managed to build around it: pre-moderation: (URL) moderation: (URL) action-figures scale (I hope) - Front wheel drive - (...) (21 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: test
|
|
And when I reply by NNTP it is not there... Todd, can you explain this? S Sonnich Jensen <sonnich@hot.ee> wrote in message news:HE7nqo.14Kq@lugnet.com... (...) (21 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
I am testing here.... just how did that no-spam thing come in there? (URL) I wrote that mail, but I did NOT add that no-spam there!!!! S (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
I am testing here.... just how did that no-spam thing come in there? (URL) I wrote that mail, but I did NOT add that no-spam there!!!! S (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: drawbridge
|
|
"James Powell" <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message news:HE4yp6.15uI@lugnet.com... (...) span (...) building (...) since (...) (rope (...) Just a thought when reading this thread: If you have trouble with motors that do not run with the (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Firts Technic creation after my dark age
|
|
I looked at the 8466 (found 2 of them here), but I am not going into that... I think it is a bit too expensive for just having fun, so I stick to the 80'ies Technic (or Expert Builder style) S (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please do whatever business thingo you did that lead tothe 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:3EAFFAAC.C448F1...faq.com... (...) There's a (...) hideous. It (...) still (...) shade). (...) puke (...) panels (...) to come (...) I'm with you there! The color sucks and yes, going (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Son of Walker
|
|
I hate to see a good thread die, so I decided to throw down the gauntlet for small weight shifting bipeds. Mine has *huge* feet and looks kind of dufy, but it does weight shift. It is the first time I've ever used a micro-motor. (URL) else up for (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Steven Lane writes: <snip> (...) The problem I see is the most of the responders to this thread don't want a set for the models it creates, they want it for the parts. I say fooey to the parts, you can get those on Bricklink, I (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please do whatever business thingo you did that lead tothe 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
(...) Okay, he's the first to PUBICLY say he likes the color. I'll be the second. Any new colors that aren't derivitives of Tan are welcomed be myself and many others. Bring on more metallic colors-we'll keep using them. They key to using these (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
(...) I wasn't asking for either, the guy who started the thread wanted the 8466 I was simply saying the 8880 was a better set for 4x4 parts (4x4 parts being the reason for buying either set). I doubt Lego would make special steering parts (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
(...) If it's parts, then don't ask for sets and ask for accessory packs. If saying "Not the 8466!" cause it doesn't contain such 'n such piece, then ask for such 'n such piece in an accessory pack. If you want to build cool creations (and we all do (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
(...) I don't want a car, I never said I did, I only buy sets for the great parts and then build my own thing. I just want to build cool vehicles with driven steer axles. I also have no experience of the 8448, although I know I hate the wheel trims. (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) I'd rather have the 8466 over the 8880, even with the green panels--the 8880 is pretty neat, but overly complicated and doesn't have near the suspension 'out of the box' that the 8466 does. I find that if you want a car, the 8448 (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Vertical lift spans (was: Re: drawbridge
|
|
Well put Ben. I have seen Ben's steel bridge (and helped re-rig the cables to the pulleys after a minor anomaly), and I can attest that it is truely one of the finest LEGO bridges in the AFOL community, or in the world for that matter. It is very (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
I've just had another idea (...) The next time their is a poll to choose which set should be re-released why not have an advocate for each potential set. Each advocate could be drawn from the Afol community and state their case for why their chosen (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
