 | | JoyBricx is updated
|
|
Hi, all, I release new version of the JoyBricx. (URL) I make the program named JoyBricx for remote control (...) The new version support RCX/SCOUT, too. It can export the NQC program. Enjoy ! -- mac (22 years ago, 8-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Props for Hovercraft
|
|
(...) Well I did a little test, heres the pics: (URL) that the propeller shaft is cylindrical, not "x" axle-shape, so friction is much greater than standard axle. It worked reasonably well, even with no lubrication and old batteries. I reckon with (...) (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Props for Hovercraft
|
|
How about inserting the 24T gear into half a large turntable, and securing the other end of the turntable using axles. I know this gets very large where you don't want to get large, but it might provide stability in ways the other solutions do not. (...) (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Props for Hovercraft
|
|
(...) Have you considered using lubricant between the 1x 4 beam and axle? I know I did, many times, but never got around to do it. Do you think it might reduce the friction enough? (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Props for Hovercraft
|
|
Yes, I had tried that. I was unable to prevent all the rotation at the friction pin, and even a small amount of movement there caused significant wobble/binding. Mark Haye "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message (...) (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Hoverfan (was: Re: Props for Hovercraft)
|
|
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:H9y1Ay.8Br@lugnet.com... all your designs tobbe are very inspiring with the same major problem as my propeller :( the like to explode because the are not locked that's why i used a rubber (...) (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Hoverfan (was: Re: Props for Hovercraft)
|
|
(...) my lunch hour, this was my best attempt: (URL) you can see it only has four blades but I could not make any more easily, I'm thinking about solutions though... I connected an old 9V motor underneath it and it holdes up just fine and blows a (...) (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Just an idea for an prop for a hovercraft
|
|
"Øyvind Steinnes" <senniets@online.no> wrote in message news:H9wKLu.F5y@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) dont (...) the (...) hold (...) it seems i didn't read your post carefully enough sorry (...) oh G!!! so you should try to build the lifting (...) (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Just an idea for an prop for a hovercraft
|
|
"pixel" <pixsrv@poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message news:H9vM7J.4ut@lugnet.com... (...) As I wrote I used the #20 / #21 panels. That is the panels that comes with the Williams F1, the other has a big hole in the midle and are too bulky. I testet both (...) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Props for Hovercraft
|
|
(...) No, it only has one pin hole, and no axle holes. Why LEGO decided to do it that way I can't imagine - all previous sets (AFAIK) used the offset axle holes (present in the old 24t gears) to connect pistons, not the pin holes. IMO that part is a (...) (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
