Subject:
|
Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:11:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
408 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <Fw9xDt.70J@lugnet.com>, Sean Forbes <moeby@msn.com> wrote:
> The Agamemnon looks to be about 1k long, and it has shields, cannons and
> fighters, but lacks the Battlestar's 20 feet of armor plating to stand up to
> the pounding. However, it does have and advantage over the Battlestar and
> Enterprise that its pilots can fly in three dimensions. (again, haha)
Actually, you've got that backward-- EAS Agamemnon has no shields; no B5 ship
has "shields" in the "project energy all around the ship" sense. Some of the
organic technology vessels can absorb energy, though.
Agamemnon relies on heavy armor and "interceptor" guns-- shoot a quick-firing
gun at incoming shots to deflect them.
> In the end, the smart money is on the Star Destroyer. It's also on me not
> having a life, but there you'd be wrong. All of this info comes via a friend
> of mine who didn't get a life until about the age of 30. Everyone should have
> at least one geek friend.
Certainly. Star Wars exists on things being larger than life; the only
competition it really has is a Battlestar. The farther you get from the
laws of physics, the easier it is to blow up your opponents. :)
-JDF
--
J.D. Forinash ,-.
foxtrot@cc.gatech.edu ( <
The more you learn, the better your luck gets. `-'
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
|
| (...) have (...) The Agamemnon would be blown apart in a matter of seconds. One LIGHT Turbolaser bolt imparts roughly 30 terrawatts of energy on a target. (let alone the kinectic energy imparted by the plasma) The Agamemnon's main weopons impart a (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
|
| (...) Actually, in the "project energy all around the ship" sense, the Interceptors *do*. However, it doesn't protect the ship from damage in an armor sense, it acts as a scrambler of sorts vs. enemy targetting. No, it's not in the show, but it is (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
|
| (...) Don't be too sure about this one. The Enterprise E is the David in a battle of Goliaths. Battlestar Gallactica's landing bay is 1K long making the ship about 2K. A fully-stocked Battlestar has almost 300 little fighters, not to mention the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
