Subject:
|
Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:04:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
522 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> Ha Ha. Star Wars is actually closer to following the laws of phyisics than
> Star Trek on most points. Hyperspace and the Deathstar are really the only
> laws of phyiscs SW breaks. ST on the other hand breaks laws with most of its
> technology and it is still weaker.
Just for my own physics-illiterate curiosity, what laws specifically do you
consider the Death Star to break?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
|
| (...) Even if the Death Star used its entire structure (160km diameter for DS1, 600km diameter DS2) to fuel its hyper-matter reactor it still would not have sufficent energy to blow apart a planet. I'd say that is a major physics problem that was (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
|
| (...) have (...) The Agamemnon would be blown apart in a matter of seconds. One LIGHT Turbolaser bolt imparts roughly 30 terrawatts of energy on a target. (let alone the kinectic energy imparted by the plasma) The Agamemnon's main weopons impart a (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
