Subject:
|
Re: Some questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:32:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1913 times
|
| |
|
|
Mark Sandlin wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.starwars, Adam Murtha writes:
> > It also sounds
> > like to me that you think the X-Wing is too small.
>
> Well, it is, but that wasn't what I was trying to point out. I was trying • to say
> that most parents are more concerned with "how much toy am I getting
> for my money?" If you have two X-wing toys that cost the same, I think that
> an uneducated parent will 9 times out of 10 buy the larger of the two,
> regardless of whether the Lego set offers more creativity or play value.
>
> In all honesty, none of the Star Wars Lego sets are in scale, but some of
> them come close enough to be basically acceptable.
Well, precise scale, no, but some are very close. For example, the X-Wing,
Y-Wing, Snowspeeder and Luke's Landspeeder are all within a couple of studs
of scale--which is actually fairly subjective anyway, as it's based on the
scale height of a minifig (for example, I make my Star Wars MOCs based on a
minifig height of 6'). As mentioned earlier, the Sith Infiltrator and the
Slave I are both horribly out of scale, as is the A-Wing. It looks like the
Millenium Falcon is also going to be grossly out of scale.
:Derek
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Some questions
|
| (...) My Own Creation (...) Well, it is, but that wasn't what I was trying to point out. I was trying to say that most parents are more concerned with "how much toy am I getting for my money?" If you have two X-wing toys that cost the same, I think (...) (26 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
