Subject:
|
Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Nov 1999 03:26:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
527 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Jonathan Little wrote:
>
> In lugnet.starwars, John VanZwieten writes:
> > By the way--thanks a bunch for the scans! It's not your fault what the scans
> > show :-)
> >
> > -John Van
>
> John,
> You mentioned in your last post about how the back looks the same as the
> front and how nothing special was done about the engine. I might be wrong, but
> I think that the close-ups that Jeff scanned show the side of the Falcon. You
> can clearly see the piece that is used for the window of the TIE.
Not only that, but it's the side, angled from the front. It needs to be the side
opposite from the cockpit - otherwise, that escape pod would be launching from
where the loading ramp is. The front of the ship (with the mandibles) is
off-picture to the left.
J
--
sakura@mediaone.net is Jeff Johnston http://www.io.com/~jeffj
LEGO Want List: http://www.io.com/~jeffj/LEGO/wantlist.txt
LEGO Trade List: http://www.io.com/~jeffj/LEGO/tradelist.txt
LEGO Geek Code: SP+ CA +++ (375/6075) PI +++ #++ S--/++ LS++ Hal M+ A++ YB73m
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets
|
| (...) as the (...) wrong, but (...) Falcon. You (...) the side (...) from (...) Quite right. But it looks like Han is going to die of space exposure pretty quickly if he ever uses the escape pod. :) Paul Davidson (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets
|
| (...) John, You mentioned in your last post about how the back looks the same as the front and how nothing special was done about the engine. I might be wrong, but I think that the close-ups that Jeff scanned show the side of the Falcon. You can (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
15 Messages in This Thread: ![600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -Jeff Stembel (29-Nov-99 to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -John VanZwieten (29-Nov-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -John VanZwieten (29-Nov-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -Jonathan Little (30-Nov-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -Paul Davidson (30-Nov-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -Jonathan Wilson (30-Nov-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -David Simmons (30-Nov-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -James Simpson (2-Dec-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -Alex Roode (1-Dec-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -James Brown (1-Dec-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -Jeff Stembel (16-Dec-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -Christopher Lannan (16-Dec-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -Jeff Stembel (16-Dec-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 600 dpi scans of 2000 Catalog Insets -Christopher Lannan (16-Dec-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|