 | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Tom Stangl
|
| | | (...) OK, let's put this to rest right now, for those that HAVEN'T seen the movie. The reason there is no second blade is that Maul didn't USE the second blade during the first duel. (...) Wait until you see the Pod RACE - the OTHER 2 pods have an (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Jonathan Little
|
| | | | | (...) I don't have a problem with them making Anakin's pod one of the three. I think it's neat in it's own way (though not as big and showy as the other two) and it definitely has a crucial part in that scene. The problem I have is with them putting (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Jaco van der Molen
|
| | | | | Does the Sith Infiltrator contain 2 blades then? (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | | Yes. Jaco van der Molen <jmolen@globalxs.nl> wrote in message news:374A59B0.6CE6DD...alxs.nl... (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | | (...) Yep! (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) You know, it's funny. I guess I wasn't using my brain right (even after looking at the set), but I had thought the "Lightsaber Duel" set was for *the* lightsaber duel on Naboo, not the minor run-in on Tattoine. It took me awhile to realize my (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Richard Dee
|
| | | | On Tue, 25 May 1999 16:06:05 GMT, Steve Bliss uttered the following profundities... (...) He arrives at the duel on the scooter. No OB1 as he was in the ship. What should have been included was an Anakin fig with rucksack, but maybe they realised (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Right. But I had been thinking that "Lightsaber Duel" would have to be about *the* lightsaber duel on Naboo, not the minor skirmish on Tattoine. Hence my confusion. Steve (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Richard Dee
|
| | | | | On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:33:57 GMT, Steve Bliss uttered the following profundities... (...) Would have been better. No need to buy a sub to get OB1! Plus it might have had some (though few) good architectural parts. (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, but were it the Naboo confrontation, wouldn't it have to be called a "triel" (or a "tercel" if you prefer) and not a duel? Duel, to me, implies two. I did find it weird that they chose the Tatooine confrontation, but I welcome the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | Now with added spoilers! (just scroll down, Gentle Reader) (...) *Sigh*. Yes, you're right. If there were some way to determine the result, I would bet money that TLG would still call a Naboo-confrontation set a "duel". Maybe they didn't want to do (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
