Subject:
|
Re: Official: UCS Snowspeeder and *New* Millennium Falcon
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 05:42:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3656 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Tim Romine wrote:
> In lugnet.starwars, Mark Papenfuss wrote:
>
> ---- snippety - doo - dah ----
>
> > Basically, I want a new SW set, not one I have already despite any 'new and
> > exciting' parts it may have. I want Lego to put time, money and effort into a
> > new SW set, not to polish up old sets. And I do not think I am wrong for wanting
> > that.
> >
> > Thats just IMHO, not saying it should be yours ;)
> >
> > Mark P
> > http://www.landofbricks.com
>
> Hmmm......
>
> I don't see this set as the same thing as the first falcon, any more than I
> would see Jango's Slave I as the same as Boba's Slave I. They are completely
> different designs with different building techniques and features, and only the
> finished shape is somewhat similar....
>
> Just my $0.02
>
> Tim
I agree with Tim.
In some case a redesign of an old set can show more originality that designing a
completely new set. In fact, a good redesign that improves the look and feel of
the model to the point where I, as a consumer, would want to buy said redesign,
shows that the amount creativity and originality that goes into a set redesign
can be much more sophisticated and complex than that of a new set.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
