To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 14667
14666  |  14668
Subject: 
Re: Star Destroyer Domes
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:34:18 GMT
Viewed: 
712 times
  
In lugnet.starwars, Gregory Cook writes:

Ah, I see. Yeah, I've looked at all the pictures in the folder linked to
recently, and noted the magnets along the spine and the angled attachment
method along the trenches for the plates, but I figured there would still be
some play, mostly because some pictures show the gap as huge, and some show
it as not so huge. Perhaps one was actually assembled partially incorrectly.

BTW, are there rigid connections for the plates at the rear of the ship? I
remember seeing peg/axel connectors (located underneath the plates, along
the back edge) that didn't hook into anything, and I assumed they must slide
into something on the beam near the engines.

-Greg "Fox" Cook

The four main plates are only held rigidly along the outside. The reason for
the peg connectors along the back on the underneath is to attach the four
angled plates surrounding the engines, the main plates aren't connected to
the back beam at all. Hopefully that makes sense, if you have a picture of
the rear there's the flat bit to which the engines atach and the the four
angled bits, those four are attached only to the main plates via a series of
peg attachments.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Star Destroyer Domes
 
(...) Thanks again, it all makes perfect sense now. Thought it seems, even with amazing arm strength and some faith in the Force (i.e. a higher power and/or the magnetic strength of LEGO magnets), zooming the ISD around at all, sans stand, would be (...) (22 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Star Destroyer Domes
 
(...) Ah, I see. Yeah, I've looked at all the pictures in the folder linked to recently, and noted the magnets along the spine and the angled attachment method along the trenches for the plates, but I figured there would still be some play, mostly (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)

13 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR