To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 10613
10612  |  10614
Subject: 
Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 05:22:16 GMT
Viewed: 
431 times
  
In lugnet.starwars, Brian Stuhan writes:
I finally found some 2001 SW stuff at Target yesterday. I grabbed a couple
of the Escape pods and one of the 7127 AT-ST's.....does anyone else think
that this set REALLY sucks?

To be honest, I LIKE the AT-ST.  No, it's not a wonderful set overall.  For
$10, however, it is.  If you can manage to prop the legs in the correct
position, it can walk fairly well, and I think the way they have the hatch
is set up nicely.  Having Chewie is both a + and a - for me.  Bad because
stormtroopers are cool, good because I DID want a chewie and this is a good
way to get one.

The AT-ST only sucks on three points in my opinion:  (1) No Stormtrooper ,
(2) No AT-ST Driver, (3) The head does not turn left and right.  I can
correct the last myself, but the other two make upgrades expensive.  On
other bad news (relatively) Target clearance sales have increased my Biker
Scout Army to 32 mini-figs (at $2.44 a piece who could say no?).  Why is
that bad?  Cause how in the heck am I gonna get at least that many Stormies?
Lego HAD BETTER come up with a sub-$10.00 set including 2 to 4 Stormtroopers
next assortment round, or at LEAST a collectable mini-fig pack with 2
Stormtroopers and one TIE Pilot soon (like now).  I think that this is my
major gripe with the AT-ST, it is Imperial, after all.
2 cents,
Aaron



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
 
(...) But at least we weren't given an ewok. (...) But at least we weren't given an ewok. (...) This is the major flaw of the model. IMO, the legs/feet are decent, and the head is quite good (except for the interior, which is really slapdash.) The (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
 
(...) To be honest, I LIKE the AT-ST. No, it's not a wonderful set overall. For $10, however, it is. If you can manage to prop the legs in the correct position, it can walk fairly well, and I think the way they have the hatch is set up nicely. (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)

20 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR