Subject:
|
Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:02:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
443 times
|
| |
|
|
(Always great to hit the send button by mistake... Anyway,)
Dave Schuler wrote:
> Why is it nearly every set non-UCS this year can be described in these terms?
> What happened to the good ol' days when LEGO produced sets that were good
> *and* were good part sources?
How about the shuttle and TIE from the 2001 line and the MTT from 2000? IMHO
they're great models, and from what I've heard from others they're great
part repositories. As for model quality, I would say that the AAT is
excellent, Watto's junkyard looks very good and that you hardly can complain
about the droid carrier.
T.
--> thomas weigle | w.i.m.p.
web: http://www.ya-ba.net/
------------------------------>
.iMMersE your soUL in LOVE.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (...) Okay, those are good models, but they're in the vast minority in a two-year release schedule, so my question still stands. Dave! (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (...) Why is it nearly every set non-UCS this year can be described in these terms? What happened to the good ol' days when LEGO produced sets that were good *and* were good part sources? Dave! (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
