Subject:
|
Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:54:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
419 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Schuler wrote:
> In lugnet.starwars, Jeff Jardine writes:
>
> > It's not a great AT-ST, but it's excellent for parts. Same goes for the
> > Escape
> > Pod. Main model bad, parts good.
>
> Why is it nearly every set non-UCS this year can be described in these terms?
> What happened to the good ol' days when LEGO produced sets that were good
> *and* were good part sources?
>
> Dave!
--> thomas weigle | w.i.m.p.
web: http://www.ya-ba.net/
------------------------------>
.iMMersE your soUL in LOVE.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (...) Why is it nearly every set non-UCS this year can be described in these terms? What happened to the good ol' days when LEGO produced sets that were good *and* were good part sources? Dave! (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
