Subject:
|
What? No Ewoks?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 02:08:25 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
!
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
503 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, James Simpson writes:
> But at least we weren't given an ewok.
>
> james
Oh, you must've gotten the AT-ST without the stickers. A few boxes
slipped past Lego Quality Control without them. Here's a scan of the
sticker sheet for the AT-ST. They go on the bottom of the feet. :)
http://www.macgenius.com/images/doa_ewok.jpg
...and YES, I have too much time on my hands...
- Sean
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: What? No Ewoks?
|
| ...and, sorry they're not to scale. I know some of you Ewok fans out there are eager to print these out. I painted something similar on the bottom of my Ertl AT-ST Snap-Titea couple of years ago. - Sean (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: What? No Ewoks?
|
| (...) Nice to know that there are others with a similar sense of humor.......as my wife wonders why I am laughing uproariously....... John (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: What? No Ewoks?
|
| (...) LOL... if only Lego would really do something like that... of course I doubt Lucasfilm would allow it. It's too bad Jar-Jar never met up with an AT-AT... I'd love to see him squashed under foot... >:) -Bryan hobartrus@hotmail.com (URL) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (...) But at least we weren't given an ewok. (...) But at least we weren't given an ewok. (...) This is the major flaw of the model. IMO, the legs/feet are decent, and the head is quite good (except for the interior, which is really slapdash.) The (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
