Subject:
|
Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 04:27:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
432 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Jeff Jardine writes:
> It's not a great AT-ST, but it's excellent for parts. Same goes for the Escape
> Pod. Main model bad, parts good.
Why is it nearly every set non-UCS this year can be described in these terms?
What happened to the good ol' days when LEGO produced sets that were good
*and* were good part sources?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (Always great to hit the send button by mistake... Anyway,) (...) How about the shuttle and TIE from the 2001 line and the MTT from 2000? IMHO they're great models, and from what I've heard from others they're great part repositories. As for model (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (...) It's not a great AT-ST, but it's excellent for parts. I plan on buying many as soon as they go on sale. Same goes for the Escape Pod. Main model bad, parts good. Jeff J (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
