Subject:
|
Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:09:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
401 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Thomas Weigle writes:
> > Why is it nearly every set non-UCS this year can be described in these terms?
> > What happened to the good ol' days when LEGO produced sets that were good
> > *and* were good part sources?
>
> How about the shuttle and TIE from the 2001 line and the MTT from 2000? IMHO
> they're great models, and from what I've heard from others they're great
> part repositories. As for model quality, I would say that the AAT is
> excellent, Watto's junkyard looks very good and that you hardly can complain
> about the droid carrier.
Okay, those are good models, but they're in the vast minority in a
two-year release schedule, so my question still stands.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (Always great to hit the send button by mistake... Anyway,) (...) How about the shuttle and TIE from the 2001 line and the MTT from 2000? IMHO they're great models, and from what I've heard from others they're great part repositories. As for model (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
