 | | Re: Preparing to post....
|
|
Yuck! My advice: save up about $300 and you can buy any one of a variety of real nice megapixel cameras with close-up macro and smart card capability. Trust me, it'll be worth it to you in the long run. ~Mark (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing to post....
|
|
(...) I picked up a digital camera made by Polaroid for $100 at Walmart. It's not the best digital camera, but it does have a preview screen (a must) and it came with the serial cable and the power adaptor (another must.) It only does 640x480 and (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Scaling question
|
|
(...) They're scaled from the "actual" dimensions of an X-Wing and a TIE Interceptor. -Bryan (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: MF review....
|
|
(...) Heck with the Belville pink, where's the Maersk Light Blue? best LFB (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | 2001 line-up
|
|
I remember a recent discussion on how small the 2001 Star Wars line-up was compared with usual. It just came to me then that, both last year and this year, Lego released to waves of models. This year the earlier wave seemed to be cheaper and (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing to post....
|
|
I'm *real* happy with my Olympus C-3030 ($825 from www.thedigitalkingdom.com) which I am putting to very good use developing materials for the first lego league team I am coaching. -Peter Matt Sekerak <lowlead@aol.com> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing to post....
|
|
Thanks Scott. Cool website! I just read the latest on photographing Lego...it makes me want to buy the top o' the line camera. I think, however, that I can get away with an entry level model. Thanks again for the tips. -Ma (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing to post....
|
|
Matt, (Cross posted to publish as well) (...) so I (...) Imperial (...) post (...) input (...) I like my Toshiba PDR-M1 myself, you can check my site for some examples. It was pretty cheap, and it has a 3.5" disk adapter for the Smart Media card (...) (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Preparing to post....
|
|
Hey people. I'm seriously thinking about the purchase of a digital camera so I can finally put some of my SW stuff on the site. The completion of my Imperial Shuttle was the catalyst. Can anybody recommend a camera? Also, when I post the images on (...) (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS scaling
|
|
"Jonathan McKay" <vebble2669@aol.com> wrote in message news:G08qCv.K4I@lugnet.com... (...) According to the info in the instruction box, the "real" X-wing is 12 meters long. On that basis, I'd say a Technics figure is a little bit too big and (...) (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: MF review....
|
|
(...) Wheres the pink??? NICK :-] (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Soccer bus pics
|
|
(...) (snip) The Tauntan (sp) looks great...like a certain castle horses :) James (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: A thought about minifigures for UCS
|
|
Hi! Mike Case schrieb: (...) I would rather like to see TLC NOT creating any figures for the UCS at all!!! If they do, they admit that the UCS sets use a common scale and thus cannot make things like a UCS Star Destroyer or other capital ships. CU, (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | A thought about minifigures for UCS
|
|
Maybe it's time Lego dusted off the larger scale figures found in many sets of the mid 1970's? Since they would fit into the definition of a 'construction toy' even more than the minifigs do, it wouldn't infringe on the 'action figure' license. (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | UCS acaling...
|
|
They can't make UCS scale figures, because they would be *technically* action figures, and lego doesn't have the permit to do this..... Jonoman (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Dan Jassim
|
|
Wow. Why is this guy not on Lugnet? Or more appropriatly in Lugnet.space? These are some great ships. My favorite, probably predictably is the red transport. Very realistic and bulky! Very solid. the red and grey scheme looks great. The interior is (...) (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: #7191 UCS X-Wing brief review
|
|
(...) so (...) I can just see the header on the memo in the product development division, "One month wait necessary for the wings to sag to their proper alignment. Should the consumer be informed?" What I can't figure out is why they didn't copy the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: #7191 UCS X-Wing brief review
|
|
HAR HAR! Good one, Bryan. The cafeteria analogy had me rolling. That's a perfect summation of my initial impression upon opening the box. "Thanks for the money, here's yer plastic." *plop* *plop, plop* Bryan Wong <green_paper@hotmail.com> wrote in (...) (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Scaling question
|
|
Too true, the RD unit is off compared to the rest of the ship. Not only that, but he's also riding too tall in the saddle. Only his dome should be visible. You'd think with all the attention to detail they put into this set that they would've paid (...) (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | UCS Scaling...
|
|
It's Jono - the scale is on tha box - i *think* it's 1/28th, but i'll check tomorrow (its 1:30 am) Jonoman (still in search for a 6286) (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
