 | | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
|
(...) A person who claims working at Target confirmed what Kotaro has mentioned, and he requested not to mention his name, I don't know how legit it is.. but here it is :- quote "Hello, I was reading your post about the At- At, and the guy from (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: I finished my Star Destroyer!
|
|
(...) I'm sorry, but two fact stopped me from taking 'in progress' pictures: 1) the quality of my camera 2) the excitement of the building. No way was I inserting pauses in the building process. Well, only to eat, to sleep and to work. No use (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifigs of #4483 (#4483 AT-AT 2003!!!)
|
|
(...) MMM...MMM..... Man, Snow Troopers were the *best* troopers. I am SO looking foward to them.. Mark P (URL) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Minifigs of #4483 (#4483 AT-AT 2003!!!)
|
|
Hi again, Evan. Today,Sunday,the 2nd and the Last day of Fan-Day, my friend went to the LEGO-JAPAN-FAN event again, and gave me further information about minifigs included in #4483. So I'll notify below. In the display case, there were 4 (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Mini Tie. (Australia)
|
|
Having spoken to a LEGO rep (and his boss who was also in store) the Mini Tie is a retail set, at least in Australia. James (who couldn't think of anything else to ask about) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
|
Are there any sets else with Clonetroopers in there? Maybe the "troops" Storm or snow were in the back where the troops are... I'm getting in to this, this is great. Thanks Kotaro. :D ~Evan Butzlaff (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | astromech droid body in minisets
|
|
Maybe somebody already mentioned this, but it looks like the new mini sets <set:4487> and <set:4486> each have an astromech droid body <part:30361> with new printing (which can bee seen pretty good here (URL). This look good for all of us who have a (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: EP II question
|
|
Hey Jeff, Zam Wesell (Leanna Wase-something or other) was most definitely NOT in Ep. I. Rumour has it that her character was only created for Ep. II after Michelle Bougion-something or other, who played bounty hunter Aurra Sing in Ep. I, was fired (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | EP II question
|
|
Hi folks, Looking for a little help to settle a disagreement (and dinner is one the line). From what I can tell there are members here who far surpass my knowledge of the Star Wars saga I ask: Does the bounty hunter from EPII (Zam Wesell) appear (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Oh, just one Technical subject.(#4483 AT-AT 2003!!!)
|
|
2003 SW-Technic-line #4481 Hellfire-droid 15,000yen :) Ya-Ya-Ya, this is the last news about the SW2003 line I have. I swear. Regards. EARL-0/Kotaro Ono (URL) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
|
(...) Thank you for a nice follow, Matt. Oh, I just find a neat way to check the price! set# Yen USD$ #4475 1400 7 #4476 1400 7 #4477 2700 13 #4478 4200 20 #4479 6300 30 #4480 6300 30 #4481 12000 ?? #4482 15000 70 #4483 23000 ?? Okay, as you may (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
|
Hello, Joseph. (...) Thanks for your kind forwarding. I personally think, the set's #number (and model itself locally) was unveiled, so there are no needs to keep secret no longer. (...) Yes, yes, yes. I will show comlpletely same attitude if I've (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
|
(...) 1 USD = .00829 Yen as of 2:55 AM EST, which would put the alleged #4483 set at $190.67, or the $199.00 price point like the RBR. Interesting...so much for my UCS AT-AT dreams. I have a bad feeling about this.... -Matt . (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
|
(...) Tim and hopefuly he will assure us with what you told us soon ONLY if LEGO allow it, I my self believe you, but with no picture it's hard for people to dig. Anyhow, you mentioned that there are two AT-AT pilots and one rebel trooper probably (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: I finished my Star Destroyer!
|
|
Hey guys, Thanks for your report. Did you, or anyone else who has this model, take pictures at variousl stages of construction? I'd love to see things like the framework and the way the magnets hold on the panels, etc. Bruce (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
|
Hi, Evan. (...) Of course,,,,I think your skepticism is appropriate at all. Now I feel my powerlessness not to report any pictures. But I never give up my hope. AT-AT attacked on JAPAN LEGO MANIAXs today, so FBTB will help us by using some forces, (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
|
(...) eating at me! ~Evan Butzlaff (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
|
Hello, me again :-) Al'ight, I'll try to remember some specific shapes.... Clickable round hinges(like AT-TE) are used at 4 knees, Body and Head are shaped by gray&darkgray plates and CLICKABLE HINGE PLATES!! Body side panel can open, and of course (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
|
Hello, guys. I'm Kotaro Ono, a Japanese LEGO Maniax. Today, we have a promotional official(LEGO-JAPAN) event, and I saw the unbelievable 2003 new model !!! #4483 AT-AT 23,000yen(Hmmmm,okay, around $120-$200, I think.) I'm sorry for no photograph (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars) !!
|
| |
| | MINI MF
|
|
Hi all, I wanted to see what the MF might look like as a MINI set. I used as my guidelines that the set should be about the same total size as the other sets (not necessarily to scale with them) and the same number of pieces. Here is my solution: (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
