Subject:
|
Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 06:08:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
710 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Kotaro Ono writes:
> Hi, Evan.
> > Can we see pictures of this? I'm kind of skeptical,
>
> Of course,,,,I think your skepticism is appropriate at all.
> Now I feel my powerlessness not to report any pictures.
> But I never give up my hope.
> AT-AT attacked on JAPAN LEGO MANIAXs today, so FBTB will help
> us by using some forces, maybe,,,,in a few days? ;-)
>
> > it's the excitement eating at me!
>
> You NEVER imagine my excitement when I saw the 4-legged
> MONSTER!!! X-p
>
> > ~Evan Butzlaff
>
> Thank you Evan.
> I feared nobody replys my unreliable words.
>
>
> Regards
> Kotaro Ono/EARL-0
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=EARL-0
Hi Kotaro, I'm a member at FBTB.net and I forwarded your interesting post to
Tim and hopefuly he will assure us with what you told us soon ONLY if LEGO
allow it, I my self believe you, but with no picture it's hard for people to
dig.
Anyhow, you mentioned that there are two AT-AT pilots and one rebel trooper
probably Luke ! but you haven't mentioned any Snowtroopers or an AT-AT
commander.. because for such a set, I believe it should come with more than
just three mini-figures don't you think ?
Are you sure you didn't miss something ? Was it for sure a set meant for
mass production like the rest of the Star Wars line, or was it just a promo
set or it was just a showroom model ?
Since you mentioned it had a number "4483" I'm sure it was suppose to be a
mass production set.. Please make it cleare for us, cause this set is
considered the most wanted set by the Star Wars LEGO fans..
Thanks
Best regards
Joseph
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
| Hello, Joseph. (...) Thanks for your kind forwarding. I personally think, the set's #number (and model itself locally) was unveiled, so there are no needs to keep secret no longer. (...) Yes, yes, yes. I will show comlpletely same attitude if I've (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Okay guys, now we have #4483 AT-AT 2003!!!
|
| Hi, Evan. (...) Of course,,,,I think your skepticism is appropriate at all. Now I feel my powerlessness not to report any pictures. But I never give up my hope. AT-AT attacked on JAPAN LEGO MANIAXs today, so FBTB will help us by using some forces, (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
