To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *12408 (-10)
  Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
 
(...) The bow and stern parts are much more "SPUD'y" than the mid-sections. They (bows & sterns) *can* be adapted to to other uses, especially for large-scale constructions. But their unique shape makes it much harder. Ditto for the masts - they (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Dark Side X-wing [alternate universe?]
 
My buddy Brian had the interesting idea of making a black X-wing. We just used the x-wing instructions and changed colors as needed. I think the only piece substitution was the 1x3 slopes on the side since I didn't have black angle-bricks. Dark Side (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)  
 
  Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
 
(...) SPUD is a little better term, but the "Useless" part is quite a value judgment. As I always whip out, the LEGO theme which probably provides the most exposure outside our tiny circle of friends is absolutely dependent on pieces some folks (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
 
(...) Pirate Hull = SPUD huh? (URL) (...) -Jason +---...---+ Jason Spears Michlug - (URL) Page - (URL) Store - (URL) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
 
These pieces are more accurately called "SPUD"s rather than "POOP"s. SPUD==Special Purpose/Useless/Decorative BTW, I catagorize Pirate Hulls and Masts as SPUDs, too. OMFIAMP. -gyug (...) [...] (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)
 
  How to improve the SW Classic Line
 
My Opinion on and how to improve the Lego Star Wars Classic Line: I have developed a strong opinion on what Lego should do to improve their SW line. If I were at Lego, I would begin to incorporate these ideas after one and one half years of the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)  
 
  Re: Super Battle Droid
 
My first guess as to the joints is that they are a variation of the new arm pieces seen in the new Alpha Team sets (URL) and (URL) One of the pictures on Starwars.com ((URL) to have the best view. Let the speculation continue... -Joel (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
 
in article Gqzu44.GDt@lugnet.com, Mr L F Braun at braunli1@pilot.msu.edu wrote on 2/4/02 12:33 AM: (...) Hmm, could be. Maybe it's just shadows or the camera angle, but the parts on the left engine looked decidedly "pointy" to me. Sort of like a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Super Battle Droid
 
(...) Yikes! I have never been interested in the Technic figures (excepting the destroyer droid) but this does look more fearsome than the standard battle droid. My main question is: Does anyone know anything about, or can anyone speculate from the (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Super Battle Droid
 
(URL) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR