Subject:
|
Re: Hercules Class Capital Frigate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 4 Mar 2001 15:36:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
479 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Daniel Jassim writes:
> In lugnet.space, Trevor Pruden writes:
>
> > I right away understood your methodology when I first saw your carrier - use
> > flat base plates where you can if the design allows for it, and save the
> > good standard plates for the visible detail.
>
> Exactly! The only drawback, of course, is you gotta sacrifice underside
> detail and sturdiness. But, big baseplates do end up reducing the overall
> weight of the model. My carrier was actually pretty light. It had lots of
> tiny pieces that contributed to it's overall count. It's nice that you added
> a regualr plate in the middle so that you could extend the detail of the
> underside.
<snip>
>
> Dan
You noticed that...heh... :^) I would prefer two white plates as opposed to
grey. Those plates are there to allow me to attach underside modules and to
easily remove the modules afterwards. They also allowed me add the
underside docking ring for the current configuration. I don't think anybody
has shown a docking ring in this way before. So far we have been jutting
them out the side of our ships, which I also include in this model. Glad
you like it so far!
~Trev
Astro Lift Co.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Hercules Class Capital Frigate
|
| (...) Exactly! The only drawback, of course, is you gotta sacrifice underside detail and sturdiness. But, big baseplates do end up reducing the overall weight of the model. My carrier was actually pretty light. It had lots of tiny pieces that (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
