Subject:
|
Re: Hercules Class Capital Frigate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 4 Mar 2001 07:44:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
487 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Trevor Pruden writes:
> I right away understood your methodology when I first saw your carrier - use
> flat base plates where you can if the design allows for it, and save the
> good standard plates for the visible detail.
Exactly! The only drawback, of course, is you gotta sacrifice underside
detail and sturdiness. But, big baseplates do end up reducing the overall
weight of the model. My carrier was actually pretty light. It had lots of
tiny pieces that contributed to it's overall count. It's nice that you added
a regualr plate in the middle so that you could extend the detail of the
underside.
> The important thing is that I still want the forward con tower and the aft >reactor room and fuel tank area to extend below the main lines of the ship.
Yep, yep. It's an eyecatching design, dude. Kinda like the medical frigate
at the end of "Empire."
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Hercules Class Capital Frigate
|
| (...) <snip> (...) You noticed that...heh... :^) I would prefer two white plates as opposed to grey. Those plates are there to allow me to attach underside modules and to easily remove the modules afterwards. They also allowed me add the underside (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hercules Class Capital Frigate
|
| (...) Thanks, Dan! :^) Tim Courtney told me a little while back that he had a high ratio of plates to bricks that enabled the completion and look of his joint destroyer project. But you really have to be thrifty when your ratios are more like 1 (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
