| |
"Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message
news:B6BE8C53.DD02%sandlin@nwlink.com...
>
> Remember, your weapon was built by the lowest bidder!
This saying drives me up the wall. I mean, surely it's cheaper to use lead
than depleted uranium? Or to build a jet without ejector seats?
My point is that the idea has practical limits like safety and performance,
and when you apply those limits the idea becomes moot because, well,
virtually _all_ contract contruction is done by the lowest bidder, civil or
military or public or private or whatever!
So why am I quibbling? Well, when I see the saying "it was built by the
lowest bidder" being used to justify a less interesting design, like a
freighter with no windows, or a fighter with only one gun, or a carrier made
out of nothing but grey bricks, it's disappointing, because it strikes me as
lazy. Better to put in a bit of effort and imagine interesting reasons why
things are added to the design, to do things like enhance the pilot
survival, or improve combat performance, do some weird energy-saving
techy-gizmo function. I don't know - just use your imagination.
Then again, maybe I misunderstood the saying... in which case I would very
much like it to be explained. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Paul
LUGNET member 164
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update!
|
| (...) <snip> (...) <snip> I think your statement is the source of your issue. The phrase isn't meant to justify a less interesting design. (Besides, why would I be trying to justify something Mladen built when I don't know his reasons?) It's a (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
Message is in Reply To:
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
