Subject:
|
Re: Todd, about the Classic Space set numbers?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:16:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
793 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.space, "Iemke-P. Zeijlemaker" <iemke@compuserve.com> writes:
> > Todd,
> >
> > I've noticed a while ago that you have studied the set number rules.
> > Can you inform us a bit more than that you have done on 1/nov/00 on the 6888
> > issue?
> > How did TLG build the set numbers up?
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/temp/pcs-6800-6999.gif
>
> --Todd
Todd, even with all I've seen/heard, it's taken until this for me
to finally say, "That boy ain't right." ;]
Did you make this plot? If you did, I can't believe you actually looked
at it enough to decide that you needed a log-plot to show the
trend. I wonder what happened for the scattered sets?
Actually, now that I look at it, I think the people allocating
set numbers were trying to create a star chart of the Milky Way...
KDJ
_______________________________________
LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
