Subject:
|
Re: Scale Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:14:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1211 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Gary E. Blessing writes:
>
> Mark Sandlin <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message
> news:B69AE5FE.BC3B%sandlin@nwlink.com...
> > Bryan Hodges at bhodges@SPAMBLOCKcos.wantweb.net wrote:
> >
> > > I disagree, I think that setting up some sort of "official" scaling • would be
> > > a bad idea. I would hate to think that everytime I post a MOC I'd have • to
> > > worry about someone saying: "That's really neat but it's not to scale,
> > > citing section A417 of the Official Scaling Guide it should be slightly
> > > larger, therefore I give your model a rating of 0, please remove it from • the
> > > web immediately."
> > >
> > > We have enough rules to deal with in life, I'd rather not have to deal • with
> > > them in Lego too.
> >
> > I'm with you, Bryan.
> >
> > Scale schmale. I build things so they "look" right.
>
> Me too,I'm with you guys.
>
> Gary
I hope no one thinks I am trying to format such an idea.
My question was more to find out what method others
are using in describing their MOC's and Scales.
I have a better idea now that I know that some builders
are using Humans as 1:1 and others Mini-Figures as 1:1.
Bram pointed out Tehnics figs are another base(1:1) scale
for building. LEGO using 1:20(human) in their Dio's is
also cool to know, thanks Wayne.
Thanks to All
DaveG
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Scale Question
|
| Mark Sandlin <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B69AE5FE.BC3B%s...ink.com... (...) would be (...) to (...) the (...) with (...) Me too,I'm with you guys. Gary (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
