Subject:
|
Re: Scale Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:54:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
351 times
|
| |
|
|
in article G7uKnD.Av1@lugnet.com, DaveG wrote:
> Just wondering what people are using
> for scale names.
>
> I have been using:
> Nano for anything greater than 1:36 studs,
> Pico 1:24 range, Super-Micro 1:16, and
> Micro as 1:2 up to 1:10 or so.
>
> I have seen models with scale of 1:600 as "Micro"
> and some at 1:8 called "Nano" ????
>
> So I am a little confused.
> Any one care to enlighten me? A link?
>
> Thanks
> DaveG
I don't think most people take it as literally as you seem to be.
I've always considered things pretty broadly, as I think most people do.
Nano = really teeny scale
Micro = smaller than minifig, but larger than nano
Minifig scale = anything that a minifig can fit into or use normally
Technic = anything a Technic fig can fit into or use normally
Big stuff = anything bigger than Technic
:^)
~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin
--
Mark's Lego(R) Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | RE: Scale Question
|
| (...) And then there are all the scales I build at :) Double-width Minifig = 6 to 10 wide vehicles with room for at least two minifigs side by side. My models at this scale are usually 8 wide, but some people build 6 wide ones. Miniland Scale = the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Scale Question
|
| Just wondering what people are using for scale names. I have been using: Nano for anything greater than 1:36 studs, Pico 1:24 range, Super-Micro 1:16, and Micro as 1:2 up to 1:10 or so. I have seen models with scale of 1:600 as "Micro" and some at (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.space)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
