 | | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
Memo to all the .space-lurkers out there....if you are hesitant to post because you think your moc will not get any attention, just attach J.C. to the hull and watch the responses flood in. You'll get the people who are offended, people who will in (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
(...) Seperated for emphais and I THINK it would be (...) which isn't really making it FOR ME. (...) Capitalization emphasis added. (...) Dude, perhaps you should think about reading sentences in their entiriety, and in the context of surrounding (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
(...) but it's (...) would be (...) MOCs. (...) Dan, slap me for saying so, but I think you need to work a little subtlety into your critiques. How about saying that you would prefer something more ornate instead of declaring that it would be (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Oh relax, Peter!
|
|
(...) Can't you appreciate a little satire? After all, if you can't laugh at yourself, you're just leaving the job to others. Dave (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
(...) Is that a warning 'Itsy Nuclear Reactor Inside' ? (...) Landing gear ? You mean it doesn't just embed in the mud like Genesis ? (...) Is that the Hand of god ? (...) Was that an easy conversion for them to make ? (...) pete.w (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
|
|
(...) Thanks for the comments. That little bot was an afterthought, but I like it. I think I will take some separate photos of it. About the Endeavour, I would have liked it to be at a larger scale, but my tiny LEGO collection said no. And I (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
|
|
(...) Thanks for the comments Yeah I know about the cockpit, but i couldn't find a good way to connect it at a straighter angle. But the parts just fell into place and this was the result. I am innocent =) But as I said to Tony, I am thinking about (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
|
|
(...) The idea of a pre-pre classic space was just a last resort to have something to write on about it at all. It wasn't meant to be of any specific era or have any specific purpose when I built it - I just threw together some bricks. The two long (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
|
|
(...) Great. You will. Cheers! (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
|
|
(...) Sorry Tony, no functions on either one (oh yeah, the ventral turret on the Endeavour is rotatable, but that's really no function..) Both of them started without any exact plans, so they i didn't make place for funciotn. But it would be (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
|
|
(...) Thanks! Surprised you liked the SNOT on Siberia, it was nothing special, except the cockpit, which was pretty hard to get together.. The interior and internal structure is (mostly) at an 22.5 degree angle to the ship, but the hull on the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Cool stuff, Joel!
|
|
(...) Thanks for the comments! The SNOT on Siberia just came together from the engine and forward, though it was a little tricky with the internal structure, but that worked out well in the end. The hull's SNOT was pretty fun to do but totally (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Echo Base Entrance
|
|
The (URL) main entrance to Echo Base> is zealously guarded by the rebel troopers. Rotating shifts of infantry scouts are sent on reconnaisance patrols to scout for any signs of Imperial activity within the active perimeter of the base. A tauntaun (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
(...) Why? (...) The only studs upward bits are the external structure (and the methods to the studs to secure it), and the pilot's seat & controls. It has studs forward, studs right, studs left and studs aft. The landing gear when extended is studs (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: Falke Raumschloss Dropship
|
|
(...) Ok, I have some thoughts on this thing. One, I think the arches are looking good, and it's a good start. I think maybe you should try and organize the blue better, into a more cohesive pattern. I think the landing gear needs to be beefed up, (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) Dude, you need to try and work a little subtlety into MOCs like this. The initial idea when I built the Rapier was to have a basically cross-shaped fighter, but there's more to it than that. A cathedral is cross shaped, but it's not (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Jormungand Carrier Strike Craft
|
|
I finally built a ship that looks like it means business. I have been inspired by most all of the themed ships you guys have been building and posting here on .space. Thanks for the inspiration. Now I just need to build a capital/carrier ship. A (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | New MOC: Falke Raumschloss Dropship
|
|
Good Morning Space! (2 URLs) Pictures> (URL) Pictures with funny stuff> While I crave your approval, I also appreciate your honesty. Please let me know what you think! -Mr. Dan (21 years ago, 2-Oct-04, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
(...) Why? I don't object to people wearing a crucifix as jewellry, how is this different? Your answer might possibly need to veer off into off-topic.debate, I leave it to you to decide. (...) Is one supposed to use SNOT merely for its own sake? I (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
(...) I see it as being almost entirely SNOT! I like that some people are building blocky and ungreebled ships. We have so many factions that they would be difficult to tell them apart if everyone used the same style. (When are we going to see the (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
