Subject:
|
Re: Inside the Tribunal's Shuttle Bay: PCS Paul Dirac
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:51:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1356 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, James Wilson wrote:
| |
It’s uncanny how you read my mind. I have had in my head for some time now a
shuttle-type ship with a panoramic canopy for unobstructed downward
visibility, but limited upward/rearward visibility. It would be utilitiarian
in nature, used in an environment like the moon, and would have no need for
upward visibility (other than that provided by sensors). To its great
detriment, of course, when the 3vil forces come swooping down to lay waste to
everything in their path...
|
Who’s going to attack an unarmed shuttle whose only cargo is likely to be
scientific in nature? Oh, right, 3vil. Who do things for the sake of being
3vil.
I’m not the first to make an underslung canopy like this (Our very own Grand
Admiral has done something similar with Paradisa curved glass. I still think that it gives the ship a very interesting
profile, though.
Thanks!
Adrian
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Inside the Tribunal's Shuttle Bay: PCS Paul Dirac
|
| It's uncanny how you read my mind. I have had in my head for some time now a shuttle-type ship with a panoramic canopy for unobstructed downward visibility, but limited upward/rearward visibility. It would be utilitiarian in nature, used in an (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
