To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 28161
28160  |  28162
Subject: 
Re: Three new Wipeout MOCs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:06:52 GMT
Viewed: 
469 times
  
In lugnet.space, Alexander Johnston wrote:
  
I’m getting the impression that you are envisioning me doing something just completely above and beyond radical here. I don’t know why people freak out whenever I mention cut-out parts. I am not doing anything THAT radical. The most “severe” thing I’ve done was cut out one left and one right 2 x 10 wedge plate from a couple of old 7 x 12 wings for my AG-systems ship and it gets less severe from there. I needed a few (three to be exact) 1 x 1 clickable hinges instead of the standard issue 1 x 2 which couldn’t fit into the feisar’s chaises (Believe me, I tried and I couldn’t do it without blowing away it’s proper proportions), and I needed plenty of 2 x 3 wedges in colors like blue, yellow and red. Lego only has them in grey, so rather than go through the trouble of painting them or having to live with a yellow, blue and grey color scheme, (yuk!) I cut 3 x 4 wedges in the colors I need in half. As we all know, they are a penny a dozen. These are relativly minor and petty things, and it doesn’t detract from the spirit of lego, IMO.


Well Alexander, let’s look at it from a technical point of view.

Your MOC uses pieces of ABS plastic made by cutting up genuine LEGO elements. By all reasonable definitions, those pieces are no longer genuine LEGO elements - they’re just pieces of plastic that happen to resemble genuine LEGO elements, or even merely have remaining studs/tubes that work correctly with genuine LEGO elements... like MegaBloks elements.

It’s a model made partly from LEGO and partly from other ABS plastic pieces. This means that A) somebody who can’t afford to damage their parts can’t replicate your model, and B) it technically (and aesthetically) isn’t a genuine LEGO creation which, like it or not, is inferior to a genuine LEGO creation (or even a clone brick creation!), it being a lot less clever and ingenuous than making a MOC without modifying parts.

Also, let’s take the reductionist argument for a moment. If you’re such a stickler for accuracy, why do you tolerate LEGO studs all over the vehicles? Surely you could cut those off too, fill in the dimples... you may as well have kitbashed the exterior fairings with plastic plate from a hobby shop, as Aaron suggested!

My point is, you crossed a line beyond which it’s murky to define whether your MOC is a LEGO creation or not. If you’d stayed behind that line (modifying elements), it would have been crystal clear. As it is, you get the worst of both worlds - it looks much less accurate than a kitbashed plastic model, and whose design is both technically and aesthetically inferior to a genuine LEGO model.

I hope that clears things up.

Cheers,





Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Three new Wipeout MOCs
 
(...) I'll conceede to that. (...) I have heard this argument about a thousand times, yet I have yet to see anyone pull it off without doing what I did. I'd be more than willing to learn to be a better Lego creator if people gave me some reasonable (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Three new Wipeout MOCs
 
(...) I'm getting the impression that you are envisioning me doing something just completely above and beyond radical here. I don't know why people freak out whenever I mention cut-out parts. I am not doing anything THAT radical. The most "severe" (...) (21 years ago, 17-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

7 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR