Subject:
|
Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:55:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
307 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.space, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
|
The obvious benefit would be that we
could build 2 floors to every corridor. With the current and proposed
standards we can only build high ceiling floors. If every thing were
multiples of 12 that would allow 2 normal floors or one high ceiling floor.
It just seems far more versatile to do it this way to me, especially given
the LEGO companys fixation with even multiples. (ie. 48x48 grey plate versus
50x50) So what does everyone else think?
-Mike Petrucelli
|
I really like this idea. TLC does do everything in multiples of 6 & 12, so it
would make for some really cool possibilities as far as ceilings and floors are
concerned. Count me in for one vote in favor of this.
Captain Krotzer, The Unknown Division
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...
|
| Ok the 8 high corridors has been my biggest "problem" with the moonbase standard. I am definately in favor of making them higher, if nothing else so larger things can roll under the corridors. I would like to ask why 10 high though? Why not just go (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
10 Messages in This Thread: ![If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not... -Mike Petrucelli (2-Sep-03 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not... -Chris Maddison (2-Sep-03 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not... -Mike Petrucelli (2-Sep-03 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not... -Aaron Sneary (2-Sep-03 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not... -Mike Petrucelli (2-Sep-03 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not... -Bram Lambrecht (2-Sep-03 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not... -Mike Petrucelli (3-Sep-03 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Monorail (was: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not...) -Bram Lambrecht (3-Sep-03 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: If we are changing the Moonbase standards then why not... -Dave Johann (2-Sep-03 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|